Ordering Entity Processing as an ETL Pipeline

 

Ordering Entity Processing as an ETL Pipeline

When you talk about “loading the classes with @OneToMany before those with @ManyToOne,” you’re really describing the classic dimension-before-fact pattern in ETL:

1. Extract Pull in all your entity definitions and their relationship metadata (the JPA metamodel).

2. Transform Compute a loading order or “weight” for each class based on its dependencies:

   • Classes that only have outgoing one-to-many edges (no incoming many-to-one) are roots or dimensions.

   • Classes with many-to-one edges point back to those roots and act like fact tables.

   • You can assign each node a level equal to the length of the longest path from any root.

3. Load Process in topologically sorted order:

   • First all level-0 (pure one-to-many) classes

   • Then level-1 classes (those that depend on level-0)

   • And so on, up to the deepest level.

That’s a true ETL: you’ve extracted the graph, transformed it into a dependency-driven load sequence, then you “load” (process) each class in that order.

Computing “Correct” Weights

Rather than ad-hoc BFS counters, consider these approaches:

1. Topological Leveling • Run a topological sort on your DAG (since JPA relationships form no real cycles once all Transients are removed). • Assign each node a weight = its topological index or its longest dependency chain length.

2. Degree-Based Priority • In-degree = number of many-to-one edges (how many things depend on you). • Out-degree = number of one-to-many edges (how many things you depend on). • You can define weight = in-degree × α + out-degree × β to favor loading dimensions first (α>β) or facts first (β>α).

3. Graph-Centrality Metrics If you want a more nuanced “importance” score, use algorithms like PageRank or eigenvector centrality. Those capture not just raw counts but also the importance of your neighbors.

Why Dimension-Before-Fact Works

• Referential Integrity: you’ll never process a child before its parent exists.

• Stability: there’s a unique topological order for any DAG.

• Predictability: no oscillation—each node’s level is fixed once you transform the graph.

Putting It Into Code

1. Build your directed graph of entities (no global edge-visited set needed).

2. Use a library or simple DFS to compute each node’s longest path length from any root.

3. Sort classes by that length ascending, then process in that exact order.

That way, one-to-many classes (roots) have level 0, many-to-one (leaves/facts) have higher levels, and your “load” phase is a pure walk through a sorted list.

Would you like a concrete Java snippet showing how to compute topological levels (or longest-path lengths) and sort your entity classes accordingly?

SECOND ABSWER

.

🧠 Mathematical Framing: Parent vs. Child

Let’s define:

• Parent: An entity that is referenced via @ManyToOne, meaning it must pre-exist before insertion of a child.

• Child: An entity that holds a @ManyToOne to its parent, i.e., it depends on it.

In your example:

• Release → ArtistCredit via @ManyToOne → Release is the child, ArtistCredit is the parent.

• So in graph terms: edges flow from child to parent.

This implies: $$ \text{Release} \to \text{ArtistCredit} $$ but it’s the artist credit that must be loaded first in your ETL or persistence layer.

🔢 Index Size & Computation Time

When you say “one-to-many remains empty,” that’s accurate for the initial load phase. Since the inverse side isn’t yet populated until children arrive, ArtistCredit.releases starts as Set.empty.

This matters for indexing:

• Parent-first loads = lighter indexes, fewer joins.

• Child-first loads = heavier joins, but invalid if FK targets don’t exist.

So your load order directly affects:

• Referential integrity

• Index update cost

• Query optimization later

🧮 Progression Strategy

We can treat this as a dependency DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph), where:

• Nodes = entity classes

• Edges = @ManyToOne links

• Weight = time to compute or number of dependencies

You can rank entities by depth in the graph (or topological level):

Entity Class	Depth	Type
ArtistCredit	0	Pure parent
Release	1	Mixed
ReleaseLabel	2	Pure child

That leads to a stable load progression: ArtistCredit → Release → ReleaseLabel