All bride needs a bribe, in our culture there are no commitment without a ring. And the cancelation of the commitment (aka compromise), the bride can keep the ring(s), but not both, serious? both on my "S", such event once at a time, happened to me. And then she concluded, I will run with the rings. But, there was a problem with this "assumption", who bought the rings? Is her culture, burglary is a common behavior, anyhow we all growth with our natural roots inside.
But at now, fuck off, another memory running, i was thinking on "crawler", there are "a reduction on domain" to go the facts that are on interest, such thing will happen over a transition on vocabulary or domain, i will keep schema-crawler, it is a "delegation of responsability" such as i said about "jackson", it's their problem not mine. The first domain on transformation will resides on schema-crawler domain, there is a rationale about that, first the component is "user-friendly", it's a product on the run, second he (the owner) can optimize his/her tool which is very good, the tool is focused on the RDBMS with a "user-friendly" UI that permits the visualization of the ER model on it's own terms of ER relational model.
The Second Domain is "what i am doing", a Domain that can express a vocabulary that a programmwe could operate over it to build a "ORM Domain Model" which is one of my passions, and on it is what i want to work a little more, such domain permits some abstractions on programming that are very interesting to apply tweetchy stuff (need to study that too).
Comments
Post a Comment